Kent Morse,
10,000 Island Dolphin Project
Randall Wells, program director for the Sarasota Dolphin Research Program, has described the distribution of bottlenose dolphins along the gulf coast of Florida as “a mosaic of slightly overlapping home ranges of different dolphin communities.” Let’s see how this model applies to the dolphins in our study area.
Each bottlenose dolphin whose dorsal fin appears in this database is a member of one or another of
these overlapping communities of resident dolphins. This essay will focus on the community of dolphins whose range falls within Area One (yellow on the chart to the right). We have done relatively few surveys in areas Two (white), Three (red) and Four (black), but Area One has been traversed over a thousand times, with surveys occurring during every month of the past five years, a period in which over 3000 dolphin sightings have been recorded. This has been sufficient to give us a clear idea of the make-up of this community.
Any time you draw an arbitrary line as we have done in designating the route we take to conduct Area One surveys, you are likely to find yourself in the heart of one dolphin’s home range, at one extreme of another’s, and just outside that of a third. This will be reflected in the frequency with which you encounter any given dolphin while conducting surveys along that arbitrary line.
So, for example, should you query the database, limiting the scope of your inquiry to area 1 surveys, you will find that Halfway, an adult female, has been encountered 274 times while, in the same time period, two other females KayCee and Crusty were encountered 20 times and 17 time respectively. Disastre, likely an adult male, was encountered only three times in the five years under consideration here.
We are clearly in the heart of Halfway’s range. A smattering of sightings appear near the northern and southern extreme of the area 1 transect, but the vast majority – 216 – occur between marker 5 at the beginning of the intercoastal waterway around the Isles of Capri sea wall and into the Marco River.
Halfway with her third and most recent calf, Kaya
Kaycee’s sighting history suggests a different story. She and her calf Sick Joey (left) have been sighted in the Marco River, but never further south in Factory Bay or on the other Side of the Jolly Bridge. Her Area One sightings skew further north on the intercoastal. And in two exploratory trips taken into Area Three, she was in the Gorden Pass up in Naples twice.
Just as KayCee’s sighting history suggests that the heart of her range lies to the north of the Area One transect, Crusty’s suggests that hers lies to the south. She too has been
seen in the Marco River, but in five years and over a thousand surveys she has never been seen in the intercoastal waterway north of Marco Island. She has, on the other hand been seen to the south, in Factory bay. And, during surveys in Area Two, she has been spotted three times on the southern end of Marco Island in Caxambas Pass.
As I compile a list of the community of dolphins whose range overlaps with the Area One transect, I will include both KayCee and Curley, based on the frequency of sightings and the number of other dolphins in the community with whom they have been sighted.
Disastre is another story. Besides only having been seen in Area One only three times in
five years, Disastre has only associated with 7 other Area One dolphins. Compare this with 65 associates for Halfway, 38 for crusty and 16 for KayCee.
There is a third reason not to consider Disastre as a member of the community of dolphins that inhabits Area One. While the heart of KayCee and Crusty’s range clearly lies to the north and south of area 1, their sightings all fall either in the passes (Caxambas Pass, Big Marco Pass, Gordon Pass) or waters behind barrier Islands such as the Factory Bay and the intercoastal. Disastre on the other hand, besides his exceedingly infrequent forays into the Marco River and Factory Bay, has been sighted most often in the near shore waters of the open Gulf in Area Two. While this is a subject for another essay, those dolphins seen on Area Two trips along the coast (or area 1 trips that dip out into the open gulf briefly) seem almost never to venture further into the estuary and clearly represent a distinct community. So for the purposes of this analysis, Disastre will be considered an Area Two dolphin and his sightings in area 1 will be considered a sort of incursion.
Finally before we move on to establish the make-up of this community of Area One dolphins we should include an example of a dolphin whose range falls just outside of
Area One. In the same sighting that found KayCee in the Gorden River in Naples, a dolphin named MissD was observed. This dolphin has never been sighted in even the northernmost point of Area One.
So, given the judgment calls implied by the preceding examples and recognizing that the home range of individual dolphins (and hence the boundaries of their communities) overlap, following is a list of Area One dolphins, divided by status and, where possible, gender.
ADULT FEMALES 19
HALFWAY* DARWINA* NIBBLES* GIZA*
TRIGGER AVERY* BOOTSTRAP BILL* RANGLE*
SYDNEY* SPARKLE* TATTOO* PATCH'S TWIN*
SPARKY* VICTORIA* CAPTAIN HOOK* TESS*
KAYCEE* PAYTON* CRUSTY*
*currently with calves
ADULT MALES 21
C.U. JIMMIE FLAG SHARKS TRIXIE
SUTILE* TUCKER OSCAR CAPTAIN JACK
BANGLE CALAMITY MARCO SCOOP
FINCH AJAX SEASTAR JINGLE
SPIKE CAPRI INTRUDER DESMOND
PATCH* HATCHET
CAM
Spacing indicates strong association indicative of pair bonding
*no longer seen
CALVES 16
GUMBO AUBREY JING JING ANGEL HILTON
DOUBLE DIP DESTINY NADINE SLICK JOEY STAR
MOCHA CAMERON KEEGAN* KAYA* JAYSON
FLIPPER
*young of year
YOUNG SUB-ADULTS 10
SIMON BABY BLUE ORANGE LUCKY CHARM SEYMOUR
RIPPLE SINTAS STELLAR EL TERRIBLE FARKLE
OLDER SUB-ADULTS 7
MAMAWANE BUTTON BATMAN ROCKY RAKES
ELLIE MAY KONA
DOLPHINS NO LONGER SEEN
PATCH SUTILE F.BACON FARKLE* FENDER
PINTA+ BUTTERMILK+ GUS* HOPPY+ MR. CLEAN*
EL TERRIBLE* EL DUKE* BABY TATTOO SPARK+ SHERA++
NOTCH
*clean fin (difficult to distinguish) +deceased ++probably deceased
You will want to know how I arrived at these conclusions.
The designation of adult females is based entirely on observing them in long term associations with a calf or, in some cases calves (Halfway has cared for three calves during the period we have observed her).
The designation of Adult males is based in part on size but also on association patterns consistent with male pair bonds or alliances as described by the folks at the SDRP.* We always see these paired males together and often escorting one of the females in the area. Hatchet and Capri were borderline: their association patterns suggest and incipient male alliance but they are more frequently seen with other adult males and rarely with any of the females in the population. I imagine them as on the cusp of adulthood but still too young to be players in the mating game but that may be exactly wrong.
The young sub-adults were all still calves in close association with their mother when we first encountered them and given that both the research at the SDRP and our own observation suggests that calves remain with their mothers for three and five years, I am assuming that these recently emancipated sub-adults are around seven years or younger.
The list of older sub-adults involves more guess work and is based partly on size and partly on association patterns: they spend a lot of time together socializing as a group and their association with others is all over the board.
Those dolphins designated as deceased are calves that did not survive their first year of life. In only one case did we actually see a dead dolphin, the rest were assumed to be dead when their mothers were sighted without them. Several of the dolphins that we have lost track of had pretty clean fins when they became sub-adults making continued tracking difficult. We’re getting better at this.
So that is the picture of Area 1 so far. New surveys occurring now in adjacent areas will extend the range of many of its dolphins and undoubtedly alter our understanding of this ‘mosaic of …overlapping communities.’
*For insights into bottlenose dolphins from their forty plus years of research see
Reynolds, John E., Randall S. Wells, Samantha D. Eide. 2000. The Bottlenose Dolphin: Biology and Conservation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press
or check out their website: http://www.sarasotadolphin.org/